MPS! MPS!
MPS! It’s the savior of our industry! It’s the most profitable
thing in our business since zinc oxide paper! It’s easy to
sell! It locks in accounts and profits! It’s a bird! It’s a
plane! It’s bullsh**t!
WHAT? Sorry, that must have slipped through my fingers to the
keyboard. But, in many ways, my fingers may be right. MPS
(Managed Print Services) may not be the fastest way to the end
of the rainbow.
We’ve all heard that MPS strategies will result in an increase
in page volume coupled with a corresponding increase in
service and supply revenue. Yes or no? The answer, in
consultant-speak, is “yes,” but, sometimes, “no.” The strategy
often results in a dramatic increase of incremental page
volume. This happens most often when you assume management of
an existing fleet of printers which you are not currently
servicing. In other words, these printers have been sold by
someone else. As such, all of the page volume generated by
these devices will be incremental to you – at least in the
beginning of the contract (more on this in a bit).
Let’s look at the other end of the spectrum for a moment.
Hardware covered by these contracts would consist of MFPs
along with some printers (and, perhaps a few fax units thrown
in for good measure) sold by you. In other words, this is your
account and you were already selling service and supplies to
support the existing page volumes. In these cases, your
revenue and margins for servicing and supplying the fleet
might actually decrease.
Our research has con-sistently shown that combined margins for
hardware, service, supplies and financing can be higher than
the margin earned for MPS contracts on your own fleet. It’s
much more difficult to compare price when each component is
priced separately and combined into a single cost per page.
Base your offering on price alone with no other value add, and
you’ll lose the contract on that basis.
But, back to page volume. Successful MPS engagements go far
beyond capturing the page volume of a printer fleet or your
own MFP units. The real savings come, not from selling
supplies for less, but from reducing the total pages printed
through the use of a compre-hensive workflow analysis.
Consider a few examples from your own experience.
• Do you really need a directory of all physicians in your HMO
plan, or would you rather know if the physician you need is in
the plan?
• Do you
own any stock? When was the last time you read the extensive
10K report sent to you? How about the annual report?
• For you
“older” readers – do you really need a hardcopy prescription
statement every month (calculate 3 – 4 pages x 12 months x
number of subscribers), or would you rather know when you are
getting close to the allowance cap?
How much of this winds up in the circular file? How much
should never have been printed in the first place? How many
examples do you have in your own accounts? What would the
impact be in any of these accounts if you conduct a workflow
analysis to reduce overall page volume by 10%?
I can hear multitudes now. “Are you crazy? I’m trying to
increase pages and you’re giving me strategies to reduce that
number?” Well, I may be crazy for a bunch of other reasons,
but not this one. If you capture a fleet of printers
generating, say, 100,000 pages per month and reduce volume by
10%, you’re still left with 90,000 pages per month that you
didn’t have before. If each page currently costs $0.02, you’ve
reduced your customer’s cost by $200 per month, or $7,200 over
the life of the contract. But, you still gain revenue and
margin from the remaining 90,000 pages. $7,200 buys a lot of
toner!
A few years ago, Lexmark ran a series of broadcast ads stating
(and I paraphrase), “Other companies show you how to print for
less. We show you how to make less prints.” I don’t know what
happened to the campaign, but the message could not be more
relevant in today’s market. Show your MFP customers how to
reduce print volume, and cost per page becomes secondary.
Another method can be used to increase your margins with
respect to supplies. This is the part of this article that
your manufacturer is going to hate. We’ve alluded to software
that we’ve tested that allows you to incrementally reduce the
amount of toner the printer uses. This can be any printer from
any brand. This is not the same as an all-or-nothing
toner-save or draft mode found on many printers. This setting
can be adjusted in a manner that allows you to tone down the
amount of toner spread on the page while still providing
prints that look as good as those using the printer’s default
print settings.
Imagine being able to reduce your customer’s toner consumption
by 10% - 20% without making their documents look any
different. While your MFP manufacturer obviously wants you
buying as much toner as possible, what if you could still get
that penny/page from your customer but reduce the amount of
toner you’re buying by that same 10% - 20%? I’m no rocket
scientist but I’m smart enough to know that if I sell my
clicks for the same amount and reduce the amount of toner I
buy each month, I’m going to make more money. Contact us (
info@industryanalysts.com ) to find out more about this
soft-ware. This is money on the table and we can show you how
to get it.
Whether you’re reducing your customer’s print volume or the
amount of toner they use, the message is still the same. Print
less. Earn more. What a country!
Andy
Slawetsky is President of Industry Analysts, Inc., a marketing
and management consulting firm for the office automation
industry. Much of the company’s research and testing results
can be viewed on their website
www.industryanalysts.com.