|
Xerox 5090/Docutech
135 Techinical Information
By Raymond
Cote
Over the past few months, I’ve received quite a few tips on
repairs from the field, and I’d like to thank everyone for their
input. I’ve compiled a list of most of the tips and would like
to share them with you. Most of the technicians out in the field
have some documentation at their disposal, and when they use it,
it usually brings them to a logical conclusion. Some techs, on
the other hand, are working with little or no documentation
whatsoever. I hope that this information will help out in some
way. Also, I encourage everyone in the field to purchase the
latest field service manual from Xerox to make their lives a
little easier. All documentation, by the way, can be purchased
online at
www.xerox.com.
Platen Glass
Cleaning
This may sound like a stupid topic to discuss, but as
you read the following information about the platen glass,
you’ll see how important it is to clean the platen properly and
the problems you can cause if you don’t.
A number of techs have expressed their concerns about
cleaning the platen glass. Most Xerox-trained techs know that
the platen glass is coated with a sensitive protective coating
that is vulnerable to any commercial cleaning agent. It’s
strongly recommended that you not use commercial cleaning agents
to clean the platen glass. However, improper cleaning agents are
being used in the field to clean the glass surface. More
customers are performing their own maintenance on their copiers,
and it’s easy for them to pick up a jar of commercial glass
cleaner and use it with the intention of cleaning the glass.
What seems like a simple glass cleaner is actually degrading the
magnesium fluoride coating on the platen glass, and when enough
of the material is washed away, the results will be a stray
light problem. A host of 09-xxx faults will result, and you may
even experience several 05-xxx document handler problems as
well.
To avoid
an early replacement of the platen glass and photoreceptor belt
due to 09-xxx stray light system faults, follow these procedures
when cleaning the glass. Xerox recommends using a soft cleaning
cloth (35P3191) and a specific glass cleaner (43E140) that won’t
leave any streaks. Or you can go to your local grocery store and
purchase a bottle of vinegar-based glass cleaner. I’ve used the
small (white) square cotton wipes used in the printing industry
to apply the vinegar to the glass, and then I use a dry cotton
wipe to remove the vinegar. When using any type of liquid on the
glass, use a slightly damp cloth so that there are no accidents
with the fluids getting into the optics cavity.
After the glass is cleaned, check the surface for any streaking
because it will have an effect on the Dc-951 xerographic setup.
The front cover (2K18462) on the document handler should be
removed to gain access to the platen glass so that the bottom
can be cleaned as well. As a substitute for vinegar, use plain
water (sparingly) on a very soft cloth. Actually, water is
probably the best cleaner available because it contains no harsh
chemicals and won’t destroy the protective coating on the platen
glass. Antistatic fluids should never be used on the platen
glass. These fluids will leave a thin film on the platen glass
that will actually increase stray light and, thereby, cause the
photoreceptor belt (1R88) to have an early end of life (09-203
and 09-204). Have you ever wondered why the photoreceptor in
certain machines won’t get past 400,000 impressions? Find out
what the customer is using on the glass. Question the customer,
and ask if they’ve been experiencing a lot of 09-xxx “stray
light system faults.” My guess is they were using antistatic
fluid on the platen glass to help the document handler work
better. Makes sense, doesn’t it. By the way, a new platen glass
(90P411) sells for $294, and a new photoreceptor belt (1R88)
sells for $365. Vinegar sells for about 95 cents.
Vertical
Transport Ski Magnet Failures
Many
field techs have expressed concerns about the magnetic strips on
trays 1 and 2 and the duplex tray. All copiers in this family
share this problem. Transport skis separate from the magnetic
strips as the adhesive dries out. Sometimes good commercial
instant glue will repair the delamination of the ski and magnet
until the ski is replaced. Carefully examine the assembly (while
it is out of the machine) to see if the ski and its holder are
free of any physical damage. If you notice that the ski is in
good physical shape and the only thing that needs attention is
the loose magnet, then repair the device and reinstall it in its
proper location. As the ski wears, it will show signs of
discoloration and possibly evidence of wear. As you examine it,
take notice of any wrinkles or distortions in the ski. If you
see something, then replace the ski.
All too often, we troubleshoot a
two-sided-copy jamming problem and overlook the ski assembly in
each of the three tray positions. We sit on a box of paper with
the doors open and the interlocks cheated to observe the machine
in a print condition while watching the paper path, keeping in
mind that the paper is feeding at 135 copies per minute and it’s
sometimes quite difficult to see the actual problem. So, we sit
there with a dumb look on our faces trying to figure out what
the heck is wrong. The vertical transport belts (600K6991) and
the vertical transport sensor (130K17476) have been recently
replaced, and still we have this jamming problem. We closely
examine the duplex ski assembly (30K53681) and note that the
plastic strip has a small tear in it that is actually slowing
the paper considerably when it exits the duplex tray. The random
jamming problem goes away when we change the ski assembly. On
close examination of tray 1 ski (30K53691) assembly, we note
that it’s discolored and deformed. Tray 2 ski assembly
(30K53701) is in similar condition also. When all three
assemblies are replaced, the 5690 runs nonstop.
All too
often with these two-sided-copy jams, we seem to tear the
machine apart and replace parts that don’t need to be replaced
to resolve the jamming issue. And while we’re on the subject,
when was the last time you checked the drive/blower motor
assembly? Now is a good time to check the assembly from the rear
of the machine. Remove the rear panel, and open the access door
to the rear of the tray area. Observe the O ring belt (23E741)
while the copier is running. If you see that the belt is
stretched, it will have excessive slop on the pulleys. The
stretched belt slips on the drive pulley, causing jams in the
paper feed of the duplex tray (not enough vacuum). After you
replace the O ring belt, do the adjustment (ADJ 8.11), and the
duplex tray will feed into the next century.
Dog-Ears
Duplexing 12-, 13-, and 14-inch paper
Ever have excessive skew or dog-ears while running
duplex jobs with 12-, 13-, or 14-inch paper? As the paper leaves
the duplex tray, it hits the vertical transport. It took a long
time to realize, but the cause of the skew is because there are
no guides in the 12-, 13-, or 14-inch area. The good news:
there’s a retrofit that will fix this problem. If your customer
uses a lot of these weird paper sizes, then order a duplex paper
guide repair kit for your Docutech printer (family), kit number
600K34680. This advice is thanks to a tech in
Maine that
experienced the problem with a customer that ran 12-inch paper
exclusively.
08-152 and
08-153 Paper Jams
Thanks to a tech in eastern
Los Angeles
who tells us that after troubleshooting a paper feed problem,
the RAP led him to replace the registration transport sensor
assembly (130E342). Sounds simple, and the documentation worked
perfectly. The problem was the customer needed the machine to
work over the weekend, and it was a Friday, after 6 p.m. local
time. Knowing his supplier was closed for the weekend, he
decided to open the registration transport sensor assembly to
see if it could be cleaned or repaired in some way. Using a
scribe, he carefully removed the dust cover, and once the cover
was removed, he was able to identify the problem. Paper lint was
covering the sensor assembly to a point that it couldn’t
function. After he blew out the dust, he replaced the cover and
returned the sensor assembly to the registration assembly. On
Monday morning, the sensor assembly was ordered through his
regular vendor, and when the part arrived, it ended up on the
parts shelf for another two months before the part was expensed.
Scratches on
the Photoreceptor Belt
A self-maintainer in
Florida
told me in an e-mail about a scratching problem that couldn’t be
wiped off. After several photoreceptors were destroyed, he
discovered that foreign material had somehow managed to get into
the developer housing. My initial advice was to use the CQ-9-604
RAP in the service manual to isolate the cause of the scratches.
It was determined that the developer was developing more than a
latten image on the photoreceptor belt. He removed and
disassembled the developer housing to investigate the problem.
He removed all three developer rolls and closely inspected them.
He noted that two bearings (13E3590) were close to failing; the
third bearing was totally destroyed. Although the bearing was
destroyed, it was still turning on the magnetic developer roller
shaft and was heating up, causing the toner to melt and form
little rocks that destroyed the new photoreceptors. While the
developer housing was open, he examined the paddle wheel
bearings (413W21052) and paddle wheel (600K17790). He determined
that the trimmer bar (25E10) was razor sharp and needed to be
replaced as well. While there, he noted that the mixing auger
(94K850) and bearings (413W21054) were also in dire need of
being replaced.
It’s interesting to note that any bearing that heats
up can cause the toner to melt and form rocks. Once rocks form,
your photoreceptor belt is doomed. As a general practice, all
bearings should be changed at 50 million copies. Magnetic
developer rolls should have their bearings replaced at 15
million copy intervals. Don’t wait until you destroy a
photoreceptor because of failed bearings. You can’t compare the
cost of a few bearings to a new photoreceptor belt. External
sources of contamination can be attributed to frayed drive or
path belts, fuser agent, and fibers from static brushes or
delamination of the photoreceptor belt itself. Generally a
“dump ‘n thump” will only hide the problem for a short time, and
the problem will return. Bite the bullet on this one before you
expense 20 photoreceptor belts.
If you rebuild a developer housing and replace all the
bearings and the problem seems to come back, look at the way the
supplies are stored. A technician in
New York City
told me that one of his customers stored his toner in a basement
near a hot water heater. The storage room was not only dry, but
also very hot. Due to the high temperature, the toner was
hardening inside the container. They found that little rocks had
formed inside the toner container before the toner even went
into the toner hopper.
Once
again, thanks to all the techs that have sent in their
suggestions and fixes for various problems they found in the
field. If you have an unusual problem or experience something
that is noteworthy, please send me the information, and I’ll
pass it on to the field.
|